
LTS Group, formal terms, conditions and agreement for those either employed by us or acting as agents on our behalf.
This is our formal contract with you
For clarity:
‘the company’ means LTS Group.
‘agents’ means those instructed my
LTS Group.
‘staff’ means any person employed
directly by LTS Group or one of its agents.
The following terms and conditions form the LTS Group operations
policy with which all staff and agents are required to conform when carrying
out our instructions. These are our formal terms and conditions when entering
into a contract with you to carry out our business and that of our client base.
Failure to do so will render our contract with you void and you liable for any
resulting claim.
You are required to have and to produce at our request current
policies of insurance covering:
Public Liabilities, Employee Liabilities, Professional Liabilities, and
Registration with Data Protection
Commissioner.
We reserve the right to add to, alter or amend any of our terms and conditions
without warning or notification to individual clients or agents. Our current
terms and conditions will be published on our website
Data Protection Policy
LTS
Group does not and will not itself or via any agent or other party obtain or be party to obtaining personal information knowingly and recklessly
without the consent of the organisation that holds it, either by deception,
bribery or other means. It is a criminal offence under Section 55 of the
Data Protection Act and all persons working for LTS Group in whatever capacity
do so in the knowledge that they are prohibited from such activity.
Where
another organisation holds restricted information that is necessary to an
investigation and that information is not available from other legitimate
sources, that organisation should be approached directly by us or our agent
providing those instructing us have agreed that course of action. It will then
be for that organisation to decide whether or not to disclose the relevant information
or not and the result will be reported back to our client by us. The organisation
approached would have to be satisfied that they had a legitimate basis for the
disclosure.
Any
agent will as will LTS Group make suitable provision of services requested and
retain the personal information involved for no other purpose. Appropriate
steps will be taken to ensure that employees and agents comply with the Act
when obtaining, using and disclosing data. The company and its agents shall take
appropriate steps to ensure that neither it or any of its employees or agents
shall use any data other than in connection with the provision of services as instructed.
The company and its agents shall establish appropriate procedures to ensure
that access to the information collected is restricted to relevant employees.
The company and its staff and agents shall hold all data in strict confidence
and take all actions, and put in place appropriate security measures necessary
to protect that data from
Any unauthorised or unlawful access; and
Any accidental loss, destruction or damage
Onward use and disclosure not associated with the
investigation
The company
and its agents shall also return or ensure the secure destruction of the data
when it is no longer required for the investigation, defence of the claim or
potential further legal action. The company shall notify our client base of
those measures on request. These will include the steps the company takes to
maintain a clear chain of evidence, to store securely all original evidence and
to safely dispose of evidence at the appropriate time. We will also provide
those details with regard to any agents employed by us.
The company
should allow its client’s, on request, to carry out an audit of its and its
agents procedures in respect of the data gathered under this agreement. Both
the company and its client retain the right to remove from the investigation, employees
or agents if they are found to be acting inappropriately or if there are
reasonable grounds for suspecting that they may be acting inappropriately.
The company
or its agents shall not transfer the data, or any part of it, to a country or
territory outside the European Economic Area except with the explicit consent
of the instructing client. The company shall inform the client, (agents shall
inform the company) as soon as it becomes aware of any breach of the terms of
the Act and advise of steps that it intends to take to remedy any breach.
The company shall agree to keep the client apprised as to the progress
and completion of those steps to remedy any breach. The parties should
agree that if the company or client considers the breach to be a material
breach of the Act, they are entitled to terminate any agreement that exists
by notice in writing. Any outstanding instructions at the time of receipt
of that notice should be regarded as cancelled and the data returned.
The
5th Data Protection Principle states that personal data processed for any
purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is
necessary for that purpose or those purposes. FSA guidance on
systems and controls similarly provides that the general principle is that
records should be retained for as long as is relevant for the purposes for
which they are made. For evidential purposes the Limitation Act 1980 suggests
it might be prudent to hold data for 6 years following the cancellation of a policy
or repudiation of the claim.
For the purposes of this company any data will be held for no more than
6 months if it has been transmitted in any format to the client unless
that client stipulates in writing that it should be held for a longer period.
In this case we will not hold data for more than 6 years for any reason.
Any agent employed by us will adhere to this policy. It is vital that the
client notifies the company when a claim has been settled/closed if they
require us to retain that data for longer than 6 months.
The
information we expect from our clients and will pass to any agent.
The client
should decide on the most appropriate medium for issuing instructions. Facsimile
transmission might be insecure and telephone instructions could be open to
interpretation and lack any form of documentation. Instructions should
therefore be given in writing and sent securely by e-mail and backed up by post.
The
instructions must be explicit and transparent, with the subject matter clearly
documented. The client should provide the company with sufficient information
as is necessary to ensure that the investigation focuses on the correct subject
matter. The information provided should only be that which is necessary and
relevant to identify the subject of the investigation and inform what type of
investigation is required. This might include:
The claimant’s name, date of birth, sex and
address.
The description of the claimant and family
circumstances.
A description of the type of data required:
• Photographs
• Video recording
• PI report
• Original signed surveillance
logs
• Any other information that is
reasonably required (and justified) in order to help the client resolve the
case.
For
example the client may not ordinarily inform the company of the medical condition
that the claimant alleges they are suffering from. The instructions should
instead advise the company to assess the way in which the claimant acts and may
ask for evidence of particular activity. For example, the claimant might have difficulty
lifting objects or should not be driving. The client the company might hold
regular review meetings, thus this would help to ensure consistent standards of
work, a mutual understanding of what is required from the investigation and provides
a forum for providing feedback on the company’s work. Any agent may be required
to provide frequent updates to facilitate these meetings.
Our
contract of employment for both staff and agents includes.
No
agent instructed by us on our client’s behalf is permitted to sub-contract that
instruction to another agent or body. Agents who employ staff must ensure that
those staff are suitably qualified, skilled, experienced, and trained to carry
out the tasks required of them, if they are not then they cannot undertake
instructions from us. We reserve the right to require evidence of experience,
qualification etc of any person so employed who is to carry out our
instructions.
All
staff and agents will have been carefully chosen to carry out our instructions in
an appropriate manner, both in compliance with the law and with those standards
of ethics we hold and promote to our clients and we explicitly require all
staff and agents to comply with. All staff will act in accordance with all
applicable laws, rules, regulations and codes of practice relevant to the services
provided.
Employees
and agents will at all times ensure they do not act in contravention of our
code of confidentiality which is that we will uphold total confidentiality in
all matters at all times. Agents
will not communicate with our client base directly at any time and must direct
all enquiries and responses through us. Clients will not direct any
communication direct to any agent employed by us but will deal only with us.
Both clients and agents will respect our trading place in the instructions.
Failure
to comply with any part of that agreement will be grounds to void our agreement
and instructions.
Health & Saftey
When working on behalf of LTS Group employees, agents and their employees
will adhere to the following Heath and Safety Rules. It is a requirement of
your working for us, in any capacity at all that you adhere to the following,
failure to do so will negate the contract between us.
Under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations
1992, amended in 1999, employers have a responsibility to manage health and
safety effectively.
Driving and drivers:
Driver means anyone driving on company business, regardless of who owns
the vehicle. All staff who need to drive as part of their work; this covers
staff who drive as a job, and those who drive occasionally or for short
distances e.g. travelling to and from meetings, site visits, and travelling
to and from home to a non-permanent place of work.
It also includes people who you ask to do you favours. For example: a member of your staff or your family or friend who you ask to drop off the post on their way home, or someone collecting a parcel on their way into work, or running an errand whilst they’re out shopping. All of these activities constitute driving on business and come under the remit of HSE legislation. Anyone who you require to drive on behalf of your company, needs documented evidence of the following to fulfil the contract between us.
Drivers Responsibilities and Obligations:
Their Motor Insurance must include insurance for the correct class of business use. They must hold a current driving licence for the correct vehicle type.
They must inform you of medical
issues, including details of medication prescribed by their GP, Dentist,
Optician, etc.
Their vehicle must have been serviced
and maintained to the manufacturers schedule.
Tyres – tread depths must be within
legal limits.
MOT – A current MoT test must be
passed and certificate issued if applicable.
Every driver needs to have a copy of
your company’s Drivers Handbook and to have read and understood it.
All drivers will have a good
knowledge of the Highway Code and other road safety requirements and
legislation. They are required to comply with all such guidance and legislation
as part of your work for us. For example we would expect them not to exceed the
speed limits to which they will be restricted in their daily working environment
and to comply with the legislation relevant to the use of mobile phones as
specific examples.
Drivers are reminded that
DofT advice is that drivers should take a break every 2 hours or 100 miles on
long journeys particularly when driving on motorways. This is not a requirement
but a guideline and we would recommend it to you as good advice. Driver fatigue
avoidance strategies such as stopping for a short nap, coffee breaks etc should
be planned into a long journey.
Employers Responsibilities:
Directors and Line managers should hold documented proof that the
above has been adhered to.
The journey:
Where possible drivers should use
motorways as they are statistically safer than trunk or minor roads.
Ensure that the roads selected are
suitable for the vehicle used.
Select the journey bearing in mind
the time of day i.e. avoid schools at start and end of school day etc
The Journey – In the event of an accident, investigating bodies (including
Police /insurers /HSE) are likely to look into the following:
Was a journey risk assessment carried
out and was the journey necessary?
Are you satisfied that drivers were
not being put at risk from fatigue caused by driving excessive distances
without a break?
Has company policy eliminated the
need for long journeys or reduced them by combining other transport methods
e.g. rail or plane?
Are drivers allowed to make an
overnight stay, rather than having to complete long journeys at the end of the
working day?
Many companies reimburse staff expenses based on the shortest journey between
two points. This clearly contravenes the legislation.
locus risk
assessments.
Conducting a locus report is an intrinsically
hazardous activity. Investigators will almost always be working in the highway
at a location where a road traffic accident has already occurred. The safety of the Investigator and of the
general public is of paramount concern, and will always take precedent over any
other matter whatsoever.
There
is a legal duty, under Sections 2 (and 3) of the Health and Safety at Work etc.
Act 1974, to ensure the safety of the all concerned so far as reasonably
possible. Every accident locus is
different, each raising its own unique combination of risks. Given this, a generic risk assessment has
proved to be inadequate to providing a safe working environment. Therefore,
each accident locus shall undergo an individual risk assessment, which shall be
carried out by the relevant Investigator.
Investigators are experienced in working in the highway
due to their work, they must then be the best-qualified persons to undertake
locus report and assess the dangers involved at each. For this reasons the
Investigator is best qualified to conduct the actual risk assessments
themselves.
The
risk assessment
The
following information will enable the Investigator to do this. The Iinvestigator is in the most danger when working in the highway itself and thus
he should avoid working in the highway where at
all possible. If the needs of the investigation require that photographs and/or
measurements be taken in the highway, then the Iinvestigator should assess the locus to ensure that they are certain
it is safe to do so. If, for any reason, the Investigator considers that
s/he may be at risk in any way, then they
should not proceed.
Section 7 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974
requires that all employees cooperate fully with the measures put in place to
ensure their safety. The same section also imposes a duty upon all employees to
take reasonable care for his/her own health and that of others affected by
their work.
RISK ANALYSIS
Once the Investigator has
considered all the Locus Information, they should analyse the identified risks
involved and consider the viability of the instruction having regard to the
type and characteristics of the road in question:
Locus
reports will not be carried out on motorways unless the relevant information
can be obtained from a vantage point such as a bridge etc.
Any
road with a speed limit of 60 or 70 m.p.h. should be very carefully considered
and the dangers of the road if only by virtue of the likely speed of traffic.
Consideration
should also be given to the time of day best suited to visiting the scene,
remember we are only there because an accident has happened.
On attending a locus a safe location
should be found to park the Investigator’s vehicle, clearly a car park or off
road position would be favoured over all other. On those occasions when such a
position is not available a suitable lay-by, or similar should be identified.
Investigators will only place their vehicles in places that might be considered
‘normal’ places in which a vehicle might be expected to park. Vehicles will not
be used to protect the Investigators or the locus as you will have as a police
officer.
At all times Investigators will
wear protective reflective jackets. Only jackets conforming with the prevailing
standards of the time will be worn. Substitute or individual preference jackets
will only be used if they comply with that standard.
The Investigator must then carryout
a visual inspection of the area of interest and establish what is required in the report and what can safely be obtained. During this
visual inspection, the Investigator should always remain in an area of
safety, (an area of safety might be considered a position that might normally
be occupied by a pedestrian)
ROAD ASSESSMENT
The following must be considered when inspecting the road:
The features of the locus: -
The
volume of traffic. Would it be safer to return at another time or day?
The
actual speed of the traffic on that road as compared with the speed limit.
The
conditions in terms of the weather and or fabric of the road itself.
The
estimated stopping distance of the traffic at any given point you wish to
occupy having regard to the volume, speed, and the road and weather conditions.
The
available visibility of approaching drivers of you in the road at any given
position in which you wish to be.
Remember that the stopping distance
of a vehicle may as much as double on a wet road surface OR up to four times
greater in icy conditions. If the estimated stopping distance is greater than
the available visibility, then the AI should consider whether a ‘look out’ is
required. If the AI decides that, despite this, a ‘look-out’ is NOT required,
then s/he must justify the decision on the rear of the form.
It is accepted that the best
photographic evidence is often obtained from the position of those who’s views
we wish to represent. A car driver, for
example, will occupy a certain position in the road and we might expect to take
photographs from that position and at an
appropriate height. The Investigator must make the assessment asking the
question, is taking such photographs both needed and safe?
In doing so, you should consider: -
Can
the same perspective be obtained from the roadside or kerb?
Will
such pictures show anything of evidential value that has any bearing on the
matter?
Is
it safe on this particular road to enter the road and take the required
photograph?
If
I had assistance, a ‘lookout’ would I be safer?
If you
consider that there is a significant risk in proceeding then you MUST not
proceed. The
Highway Code sets out the standard of a competent driver, we should always
accommodate the incompetent driver when carrying out our risk assessment of a
locus.
You will need to:
Ensure
that before you move into the road it is safe to do so.
Remain
constantly aware of the movements of vehicles around you. Most importantly from
behind you but not exclusively, traffic approaching from ahead or either side
is crucial.
Take
your photograph as quickly as possible and move back to an area of safety
before checking that picture or your equipment.
If
taking measurements ensure that you take each measurement and move back to a
safe area before writing down that distance.
Make
use of any safe refuge such as central traffic islands or traffic light
controlled road crossings to cross the road to reach a point of safety. Do not
use areas of hatched marking as an area of safety. If crash barriers edge the
road always step behind them never stand in front of them.
Do not linger in the carriageway.
The AI
must also consider the effect on others of his position: -
Where you leave any equipment you are using, do not leave measuring wheels for example on the pavement for people to fall over.
Will
passing motorists or even pedestrians be distracted by your presence that may
cause them to be involved in an accident?
Will
you, your equipment or your vehicle cause inconvenience or obstruction to any
other person.
Before
leaving the locus check you have obtained all the evidence you feel is
appropriate and that you have collected all your equipment. Move via an area of
safety back to your vehicle and exit the parking place correctly.
GLOSSARY
Data
controller (Data Protection Act): A person who determines the purposes
for which, and the manner in which, personal information is to be processed.
This may be an individual or an organisation and the processing may be carried
out jointly or in common with other persons.
Data
processor (Data Protection Act): A person, who processes personal
information on a data controller’s behalf. Anyone responsible for the disposal
of confidential waste is also included under this definition.
Data
protection principles: There are eight principles of data protection
– these form the core around which much of the Data Protection Act is written.
All data controllers must generally comply with all eight, even if they are
exempt from notification. The principles
are
enforceable by the Information Commissioner.
Fair
and lawful processing: The first data protection principle requires
data to be processed fairly and lawfully. For processing to be considered fair,
individuals must be provided with certain information including the
controller’s identity, the reasons that their information is being collected
and any third parties it will be disclosed to. In addition,
it is
necessary that all personal data processing must comply with at least one of
six threshold conditions. Where sensitive personal data is processed, including
information about the health or the commission or alleged commission of an
offence, additional considerations for processing must be met. For insurers,
this will often be that the individual has provided explicit consent.
Notification
(Data Protection Act): The process by which a data controller’s
processing details are added to the Information Commissioner’s register. Under
the Data Protection Act, every data controller who is processing personal
information needs to notify unless they are exempt. Failure to notify is a
criminal offence. Even if a data controller is exempt from notification, they
must still comply with the data protection principles. The Commissioner
maintains a public register of data controllers at www.ico.gov.uk. A register
entry only shows what a data controller has told the Commissioner about the
type of data being processed. It does not name the people about whom
information is held.
Personal
data: Information held in electronic and some highly structured paper files
about a living individual who can be identified from that information and other
information which is in, or likely to come into, the data controller’s
possession.
Agent:
A person privately hired to do investigatory work, for example, to
investigate suspicious insurance claims.
Processing
(Data Protection Act): Obtaining, recording or holding the data or carrying out any operation or set of operations on data.
Subject
access request (Data Protection Act): Under the Data Protection Act, individuals can ask for a copy of information
about themselves that is held on computer and in some paper records. If
an individual wants to exercise this subject access right, they should
write to the person or organisation that they believe is processing the
data. A subject access request must be made in writing and accompanied
by the appropriate fee. In most cases, the maximum fee will be £10, but
this can vary. A request must include enough information to enable the
person or organisation to whom the subject is writing to satisfy itself
as to their identity and to find the information. The request must be fulfilled
within 40 days as long as the necessary fee has been paid. A data controller
should act promptly in requesting the fee or any further information necessary
to fulfil the request. If a data controller is not processing personal
information of which this individual is the data subject, the data controller
must reply saying so.
Surveillance
log: Records or logs of incidents and activities carried out at specific
times that serve as memory refreshing documents. They are used by private
investigators when giving evidence and should be made on the understanding that
that they may be produced in evidence.